I’ll start with the bad news; it is possible for Louisiana-Monroe
to pull off the upset against Auburn. After all, Louisiana-Monroe
beat Alabama. I know what you’re thinking “Yeah, but Auburn
beat Alabama! And Alabama didn’t beat anybody who beat Auburn
last year!” You’re right. However, if you recall 2006,
you’ll remember Alabama beat Arkansas and Arkansas beat Auburn!
It’s possible to look at that single piece of data and conclude
that Alabama had a better football team than Auburn. And that’s
not the only example of Alabama beating a team that beat Auburn! The
next most recent occurrence of this phenomenon happened in 1999; Alabama
beat LSU even though LSU had beaten Auburn earlier in the year. Even
worse, historical records show that Alabama even beat Auburn in 1999
and 2001 -the latter even occurred during this millennium!
The
2006 Arkansas games happened only a little over two years ago. So
if you disregard every other piece of information, you can conclude
that Alabama can beat Auburn. If Alabama can beat Auburn, then Louisiana-Monroe
can beat Auburn. We MUST take this game seriously!
[EDIT - It turns out Alabama lost to Ark in 2006. Ignore what
you just read. Auburn has dominated Alabama in every way imaginable
since 2001.]
That
said, once Auburn knows they’re going to win the game, there's
really no point in 'making a statement' against Louisiana Monroe.
The game’s on pay per view – so most every AP voter
and coaches’ poll voter probably won’t even see highlights
of the game much less the game itself. I don’t see Auburn
moving in the polls any if they win by 10 or by 70. Don’t
bother worrying about if Auburn would be left out of the championship
game if undefeated. It won’t happen, and even if it did, not
running up the score against LAMO wouldn’t be the reason.
The
mystery behind Auburn's new offense is an asset which should be
exploited as much as possible. It would probably be best if Franklin
held back until it was time to face SEC teams. This game should
be used as a nice practice and to maybe decide on a quarterback.
As it stands, the depth chart lists Kodi Burns and Chris Todd as
“co-starters” but based on recent comments from coaches
and players, it seems that one quarterback is more “co”
than the other. I expect Kodi Burns to take the first snap of the
2008 season.
Auburn
also doesn’t have a definite starting punter. Ryan Shoemaker
and walk on Clinton Durst are still both listed as the starter.
The press is making a big deal out of Tuberville’s indecision,
but Auburn doesn’t need a punter. Only coaches with defeatist
attitudes name starting punters.
It’d
be nice if the game turned out like it did in 2004, but that’s
pretty obvious. It’d be nice if ALL football games turned
out like they did in 2004. Louisiana-Monroe was also the opening
game that year, which happened to be the last time Auburn unveiled
a new offense with a new coordinator. From ESPN’s recap of
Auburn’s opening game vs. Louisiana Monroe in 2004 entitled
“Tigers'
new West Coast offense roars in shutout”;
The
Tigers' West Coast offense sputtered at times but still fared better
than in last year's… "It's good to come out here and
have a little warmup game and see where we're at," Auburn safety
Junior Rosegreen said.
It wasn't quite the offensive showcase Auburn fans were hoping for
against the overmatched Sun Belt Conference team, but the Tigers
saved much of their playbook for Southeastern Conference play.
"We were pretty vanilla today offensively," coach Tommy
Tuberville said. "That was just a small glimpse of this offense."
I think a similar outcome is very possible this year.